Which of the following is part of the criteria used to validate potential Courses of Action (COAs)?

The correct answer is feasible. In the context of validating potential Courses of Action (COAs) during the Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP), feasibility refers to whether a proposed COA can realistically be executed based on available resources, time constraints, and overall operational environment. A feasible COA ensures that the mission can be accomplished with the troops and equipment available while considering factors such as logistics, command capabilities, and situational factors.

When assessing the feasibility of a COA, military planners evaluate several dimensions, including manpower, equipment, and support resources, as well as the time necessary to prepare and execute the plan. This assessment is crucial because it helps prevent the selection of COAs that, while potentially effective, are impractical under the given circumstances.

Other criteria such as complexity or innovativeness may be valued in COAs but do not directly impact a COA's viability. A complex COA might introduce unnecessary complications, while an innovative one might be appealing but still needs to be practical and executable. Detailed COAs ensure that the specific actions and tasks are laid out clearly, but again, without feasibility, detailed plans can’t be effectively executed.