What distinguishes the Concept of Operations from the Scheme of Maneuver?

The Concept of Operations (CONOPS) and the Scheme of Maneuver are both pivotal components of military planning, but they serve different purposes. The correct choice emphasizes the narrative of operational progression, which is a fundamental aspect of the CONOPS.

The CONOPS provides a broad view of the operational environment, detailing how forces will achieve their objectives. It describes the "who, what, where, when, and why" of the operation, linking the overarching strategy with specific actions and intentions. This narrative is essential as it allows personnel at all levels to understand the operational intent and the sequence of events leading to mission success.

In contrast, the Scheme of Maneuver focuses more specifically on the movement and conduct of forces on the battlefield and how they will interact with the enemy. While both elements contribute to an understanding of the operation, the CONOPS delineates a narrative framework for understanding the overall operation, which encompasses the various actions and maneuvers planned.

The other options do not capture the primary distinction accurately. Leadership hierarchy deals with command structure, communication strategies pertain to how forces will interact, and victory criteria define success measures. While all of these are important in military operations, they do not define the unique narrative focus that characterizes the Concept of Operations