What are the main differences between the war-gaming methods?

The main differences between war-gaming methods primarily focus on the scenarios used and the depth of analysis. This is crucial because various war-gaming methods allow for different approaches to simulation, each tailored to specific objectives and contexts. The scenarios serve as the backbone of the war-gaming process, providing the narrative and conditions under which forces operate. The depth of analysis refers to how detailed the examination of the scenario is, including various factors such as troop movements, likely enemy actions, and potential outcomes.

This choice emphasizes that distinct war-gaming methods may utilize different scenarios that influence tactical understanding and decision-making, as well as varying levels of analytical scrutiny that can lead to different insights and strategic advantages. Understanding these differences helps military personnel choose the appropriate war-gaming method for their specific situation or objective, ensuring that their planning and execution are grounded in a robust analysis of the potential battlefield conditions.